Share a lightweight evidence habit
Direct audience and problem fit. A useful answer can stand alone without introducing the product.
Product preview · Active development
ThreadCue is a desktop opportunity workbench. It learns what matters to a project, checks selected conversation sources, and organizes the moments worth reviewing—without turning participation into autopilot.
The current prototype is organized around four linked decisions. Each one keeps the user closer to the source and further from indiscriminate outreach.
Start with a conversation: what you offer, who it is for, the problems it solves, the discussions that matter, the communities to respect, and the lines you do not want to cross.
ThreadCue extracts an eight-part brief beside the conversation. Every field stays editable, and monitoring does not begin until the brief is confirmed.
Founders, product managers, and designers on small teams who speak to customers but lose research context between planning cycles.
Interview synthesis, continuous discovery, lightweight evidence habits, and decisions losing their source.
Practical, curious, and method-first. Never force the product into a reply; respect each community’s promotion rules.
The Today queue separates “best next,” scheduled work, and useful-but-not-urgent opportunities. Each cue includes the source, task type, short context, and the reason ThreadCue surfaced it.
Scan Reddit or Threads on their own, or run every enabled source through one project scan. Each source keeps its own run history, while the aggregate view gives you one place to compare the opportunities that came back.
Direct audience and problem fit. A useful answer can stand alone without introducing the product.
A founder is asking what to do after ten customer interviews before the next planning session.
Open a cue to see the source discussion, why it matches the project, a suggested participation approach, and an editable draft. The interface is designed to make “skip this” as legitimate as “reply.”
Draft revisions are proposed, not silently applied. Community-fit guidance stays visible beside the work.
A small product team is asking how to prevent customer insights from disappearing in chat.
What lightweight habit actually sticks for a team of eight?
Direct expression of the project’s core problem from the right team size. A method-first answer can be useful without a product mention.
Review is the default; automation is a deliberate project setting.
What exists today